[governance] For information

[Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond]

Dear Jefsey,

thanks for your kind reply. My comments in-line:


On 14/03/2015 11:26, Jefsey wrote:
> At 20:06 13/03/2015, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond wrote:
>> Dear Jefsey:
>> You appear to have forgotten to list the 13th bullet point (the 13th
>> Community) that is the At-Large Advisory Committee (ALAC) which acts
>> in the best interests of Internet end users.
>
> I certainly know that this is what you wish and try to do. However,
> unfortunately, claiming acting in the best interest of Internet end
> users does not mean directly representing them. Lead users (i.e. the
> permissionless innovation main potential source) and civil sociey are
> not represented either (neither directly nor indirectly).

I'd be interested in hearing how you propose representing 3Bn people.
As for civil society, members of civil society organisations are
extensively participating in the working group. Again there, I think it
is wise to say they act in the best interest of their community.

The term "representing" has, IMHO, been used too liberally in recent
years with self appointed people "representing" others who do not know
anything about their representation.

Kind regards,

Olivier

-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t