[governance] Remote participation

Tue Apr 21 12:09:27 EDT 2015

There is no doubt that we must keep this issue alive, and address problems
as they arise, and, even more, work to plan/prevent them. The IGF in
particular, is doing its best to make sure that each meeting has better
online participation than the last. This MAG (2015) is putting high
priority on online participation in meetings. If you have any comments or
suggestions that we should take into account, or just that you want to
reiterate, feel free to email me virginiap at diplomacy.edu.
Thanks,
Ginger

Ginger (Virginia) Paque
DiploFoundation

*DiploFoundation upcoming online courses:* http://www.diplomacy.edu/courses
* <http://www.diplomacy.edu/courses>*

On 21 April 2015 at 10:28, Deirdre Williams <williams.deirdre at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Dear Arsene,
> It used to be (my observation) that meetings concerning the internet had a
> default position of trying to make their proceedings accessible online - if
> you are discussing a communication tool it seems good sense also to use it.
> However recently (again my observation) this practice has become less
> common. The ITU, the IGF and ICANN do their best within their financial
> capabilities, some institutions having larger budgets than others.
> "[I]nternational IG meetings" is something of an awkward construct since
> the majority of IG meetings are international in nature - in their speakers
> and/or their participants.
>
> I checked (not as carefully as I might have done - my non-virtual life is
> quite busy at the moment) for remote access to the meeting in the Hague.
> Judith says that remote access was available, but I would propose that the
> links were rather less easy to find than is usual with a meeting of that
> size. Recently I became aware of a meeting to be held in Malta at the end
> of the month. I was interested to attend so asked about remote
> participation. I was told that they were trying but the budget probably
> wouldn't stretch so far.
> I hope this clarifies my original message.
>
> I agree with Daniel, David and Michael - participation is crucially
> important, and in the context of the internet should NOT be measured in
> terms of physical presence.
>
> Best wishes
> Deirdre
>
> On 21 April 2015 at 09:39, Arsene TUNGALI (Yahoo) <arsenebaguma at yahoo.fr>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi De,
>> Trying to understand your point...
>> Do you mean there is less remote participation possibilities offered for
>> international IG meetings?
>>
>> Thanks for clarifying for me,
>> A
>> *------------------------------------------------------*
>> *Arsène Tungali,*
>> Co-founder and Executive Director, Rudi International
>> <http://www.rudiinternational.org/>
>> Founder, Mabingwa Forum <http://www.mabingwa-forum.com/>
>>
>> Work email: arsenebaguma at gmail.com
>> Facebook <http://www.facebook.com/arsenebaguma> - Twitter
>> <http://twitter.com/arsenebaguma> - LinkedIn
>> <http://www.linkedin.com/pub/arsene-tungali/40/825/344/>
>> Internet Governance - Blogger - ISOC Member - ICANN Fellow - IGF Fellow.
>> Democratic Republic of Congo
>>
>>
>>
>>   Le Mardi 21 avril 2015 15h32, Nick Ashton-Hart <nashton at consensus.pro>
>> a écrit :
>>
>>
>> While I am sure we all agree with the sentiment - and I am certain that
>> I’m relatively spoiled as I attend anything in Geneva in person - it would
>> be helpful to see some examples of meetings where this is a problem, and
>> especially, where annual meetings have decreased remote participation
>> options.
>>
>> > On 21 Apr 2015, at 05:15, David Cake <dave at difference.com.au> wrote:
>> >
>> > This is a serious issue. We strongly need to encourage and expand
>> remote participation, not decrease it.
>> >
>> > Remote participation in the form of webcasts and assigned remote
>> participation people to ask questions on behalf of remote participants is a
>> bare minimum. Improving remote participation by whatever means -
>> mechanisms such as properly staffed remote hubs, screens so that remote
>> participant comments are visible to those in the room, enabling
>> telepresence panellist participation, etc spring to mind -  should be the
>> what we are aiming for, not just maintaining the minimal levels of
>> participation.
>> >
>> > While multi-stakeholder processes may be much more open than those
>> gatekeepered by governments, they will remain the province of a relatively
>> small elite unless we can ensure that physical travel is not a necessity
>> for participation. I think we currently do this OK for working group style
>> processes, we don’t do it at all well for higher level processes.
>> >
>> > Regards
>> >
>> > David
>> >
>> >> On 21 Apr 2015, at 8:04 am, Deirdre Williams <
>> williams.deirdre at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Colleagues,
>> >> During the discussion of recent internet governance related meetings I
>> don't remember seeing any comments about the steady erosion of remote
>> participation or even webcasts.
>> >> Considering the area being discussed by these meetings this seems to
>> me to be a very serious loss.
>> >> How do others feel?
>> >> Deirdre
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> “The fundamental cure for poverty is not money but knowledge" Sir
>> William Arthur Lewis, Nobel Prize Economics, 1979
>> >> ____________________________________________________________
>> >> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>> >>    governance at lists.igcaucus.org
>> >> To be removed from the list, visit:
>> >>    http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
>> >>
>> >> For all other list information and functions, see:
>> >>    http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
>> >> To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
>> >>    http://www.igcaucus.org/
>> >>
>> >> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>> >
>>
>> ____________________________________________________________
>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>>     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
>> To be removed from the list, visit:
>>     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
>>
>> For all other list information and functions, see:
>>     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
>> To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
>>     http://www.igcaucus.org/
>>
>> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> “The fundamental cure for poverty is not money but knowledge" Sir William
> Arthur Lewis, Nobel Prize Economics, 1979
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>      governance at lists.igcaucus.org
> To be removed from the list, visit:
>      http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
>
> For all other list information and functions, see:
>      http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
> To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
>      http://www.igcaucus.org/
>
> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20150421/9beb8113/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t