[governance] Re: [bestbits] Call for making the IGF permanent

[Suresh Ramasubramanian]

+1

Milton L Mueller [03/09/14 14:04 +0000]:
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> I will have to be the one to provide that "almost" to that unanimity.
>> Speaking for myself, I do not support making the IGF a permanent body.
>>
>> The IGF has to be relevant and has to deliver results, and we should push for
>> accountability of the IGF.  Making it permanent isn't really going to help
>> accountability of the IGF (just as having the IANA contract be renewable has
>> helped keep ICANN more accountable so far, though the analogy is not perfect).
>> I would support making the evaluation process (for renewal of the IGF's term)
>> more participative and transparent and, yes, more "multistakeholder".
>
>Agree with Pranash
>--MM

>____________________________________________________________
>You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
>To be removed from the list, visit:
>     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
>
>For all other list information and functions, see:
>     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
>To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
>     http://www.igcaucus.org/
>
>Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t


-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t