[governance] Re: [bestbits] Call for making the IGF permanent

[Milton L Mueller]

> -----Original Message-----
> I will have to be the one to provide that "almost" to that unanimity.
> Speaking for myself, I do not support making the IGF a permanent body.
> 
> The IGF has to be relevant and has to deliver results, and we should push for
> accountability of the IGF.  Making it permanent isn't really going to help
> accountability of the IGF (just as having the IANA contract be renewable has
> helped keep ICANN more accountable so far, though the analogy is not perfect).
> I would support making the evaluation process (for renewal of the IGF's term)
> more participative and transparent and, yes, more "multistakeholder".

Agree with Pranash
--MM
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t