[governance] Tweedledum and Tweedledee WAS Re: [bestbits] Time-sensitive: 24 hour sign on period for ITU Plenipot joint recommendations

genekimmelman at gmail.com genekimmelman at gmail.com
Sat Oct 25 11:26:00 EDT 2014


+1

<div>-------- Original message --------</div><div>From: Anriette Esterhuysen <anriette at apc.org> </div><div>Date:10/25/2014  10:56 AM  (GMT-05:00) </div><div>To: governance at lists.igcaucus.org, michael gurstein <gurstein at gmail.com>, 'Jeremy Malcolm' <jmalcolm at eff.org> </div><div>Subject: Re: [governance] Tweedledum and Tweedledee WAS Re: [bestbits] Time-sensitive: 24 hour sign on period for ITU Plenipot joint recommendations </div><div>
</div>I also like Jeremy's framing very much.

Anriette


Copying here for sake of clarity:


Further, it's not as if these "great majority of people" have a choice.  The Internet (and the world) is already being governed by diverse institutions many of which have no connection with their elected representatives.  So the choice is not between sticking with a well-established system or representative democracy or switching to an alternative called multi-stakeholderism, as you seem to be characterising it.  On the contrary, it's a choice between continuing to submit to diverse mechanisms of ordering many of which are not state-based or democratic, or constructing new forms of representation that allow people, independently of their citizenship, to participate in global governance in ways that would otherwise be reserved to more powerful actors.  Meanwhile the nation state will continue to play its role, but in global Internet governance it is not not an exclusive role.


On 25/10/2014 14:51, michael gurstein wrote:
Well said.
 
M
 
From: governance-request at lists.igcaucus.org [mailto:governance-request at lists.igcaucus.org] On Behalf Of Jeremy Malcolm
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2014 5:59 PM
To: governance at lists.igcaucus.org
Subject: Re: [governance] Tweedledum and Tweedledee WAS Re: [bestbits] Time-sensitive: 24 hour sign on period for ITU Plenipot joint recommendations
 
On 24/10/2014 5:38 pm, Jeremy Malcolm wrote:

I am asking informational questions in an earnest attempt to get a handle on who it is that has authorized or is pushing for what appears to be a clear rejection of values and principles that the great majority of people in the world would be very unlikely to give up (at least not easily), and what political system is being recommended to replace it.

Further, it's not as if these "great majority of people" have a choice.  The Internet (and the world) is already being governed by diverse institutions many of which have no connection with their elected representatives.  So the choice is not between sticking with a well-established system or representative democracy or switching to an alternative called multi-stakeholderism, as you seem to be characterising it.  On the contrary, it's a choice between continuing to submit to diverse mechanisms of ordering many of which are not state-based or democratic, or constructing new forms of representation that allow people, independently of their citizenship, to participate in global governance in ways that would otherwise be reserved to more powerful actors.  Meanwhile the nation state will continue to play its role, but in global Internet governance it is not not an exclusive role.


-- 
Jeremy Malcolm
Senior Global Policy Analyst
Electronic Frontier Foundation
https://eff.org
jmalcolm at eff.org
 
Tel: 415.436.9333 ext 161
 
:: Defending Your Rights in the Digital World ::

-- 
`````````````````````````````````
anriette esterhuysen
executive director
association for progressive communications
po box 29755, melville, 2109, south africa
anriette at apc.org
www.apc.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20141025/c2e774f1/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t


More information about the Governance mailing list