[governance] Re: NMI and the Brazilian CGI.br

[Suresh Ramasubramanian]

> 
> I am greatly disappointed that so many friends in the CGI.Br has now come
> out to vouchsafe or front for what is basically a WEF and ICANN (basically
> doing US's bidding) game.

Disappointed?  My heart bleeds for you, to be sure.


> everyone knows WEF to be. Do the Brazilians, who kind of gave the world
> the World Social Forum, really need to be reminded of the basic lessons
> with regard to the designs of global domination by a certain economic and
> political elite, and their impatience with democracy, especially at the
> global level!
> 

Now you call them naïve.   How incredibly patronizing.

Any so called "democracy" of the sort you seem to want, that excludes stakeholders based on any nationality and/or economic backgrounds that you dislike, is emphatically not a democracy, but merely pure demagoguery.  Makes me glad that you continue to remain far, far away from the civil society mainstream thinking on this subject.

> Again, you are fast expending the political capital that the Brazilian
> government and CGI.Br has,  something that I find to be such a great loss,
> and very much hope were not the case. *The global progressive community
> has consistently  supported you, but this support cannot be taken for

I admire how you keep attempting to speak for the global progressive community, in pushing the regressive agenda that you continue to push, and that the majority of the community apparently doesn't share.

> granted, which is my unfortunate duty to tell you, as you come out
> publicly to seek global support for a WEF centred global governance
> initiative.*
> 

Your support, and those of the small splinter group of extremists that caucus with you? Well, may the good Lord preserve us all from such support.

> Your statement says that you are willing to dialogue and work together
> with everyone. Some of us from global progressive civil society offer
> ourselves for such a dialogue. We have in our hands today the interests
> and fate of the people of the world,  and of the future generations. Let

That sounds more like a royal "We" than any sort of inclusiveness.  Do stop trying to speak for civil society at large.  You don't and have never represented it all.

--srs
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t