[governance] PP: India wants to abolish BGP and introduce national routing and IP management
Barry Shein
bzs at world.std.com
Mon Nov 3 13:09:20 EST 2014
Yes but the point is that the Russian Federation didn't split between
RIPE and APNIC because, for example, a large part of their sovereign
territory is in the continent of Europe and another in Asia.
In theory they perhaps could have argued for that and "double-dipped".
It may have been to their advantage, a bigger pool.
But the make-up of the RIRs was (with some pragmatic exceptions) sets
of nation-states.
The RIRs list these countries quite clearly, there's no reading
between the lines involved:
https://www.arin.net/knowledge/rirs/countries.html
And head that with:
This comprehensive list of countries is provided as a reference
tool to identify the region in which any particular country or
economy is located.
I believe "or economy" is just saying what I say when I point out that
there are some pragmatic exceptions (e.g., island territories.)
THE original point I was addressing was that someone said allocating
IP addresses along "Westphalian" lines was (choose a word,
inappropriate? unprecedented?) I don't think that's a good
characterization.
On November 3, 2014 at 10:21 daniel at digsys.bg (Daniel Kalchev) wrote:
>
>
> On 01.11.14 06:02, Barry Shein wrote:
> > Perhaps stating a contrapositive is even more clear: Other than
> > perhaps some small outlying islands or similar special cases no
> > nation-state is split between two RIRs. Even the vast Russian
> > Federation which spans two continents is entirely within only the RIPE
> > NCC region.
>
> My understanding of the way people in Russia think is that they prefer
> to be considered an entity on their own. If not, they would prefer to be
> part of Europe.
>
> Them being part of the RIPE is for one, and one reason alone: RIPE was
> the only functioning entity they could interact with. RIPE, being
> informal group of Europeans were much more tolerant to the Russians and
> always interfaced with them on practical matters. They always had
> various issues trying to bypass RIPE, which is what they would naturally
> do, as their other choice was to deal with the US based Internic and
> that was difficult at the time. We also need to remember that within a
> nation-state, there are many different, often antagonizing interests.
>
> The development and outcome of the interaction between Russia and RIPE
> is an interesting topic to study.
>
> Daniel
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
> governance at lists.igcaucus.org
> To be removed from the list, visit:
> http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
>
> For all other list information and functions, see:
> http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
> To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
> http://www.igcaucus.org/
>
> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
For all other list information and functions, see:
http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
http://www.igcaucus.org/
Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
More information about the Governance
mailing list