Trivial to implement "to be forgotten" (was: Re: [governance] [IP] On Monday EPIC Freedom Awards to Allen, Amash, The Guardian, Snowden + Google right to be forgotten link
John Curran
jcurran at istaff.org
Fri May 30 17:52:31 EDT 2014
On May 30, 2014, at 5:15 PM, Lorena Jaume-Palasi <lorena at collaboratory.de> wrote:
>
> http://www.cambridge-code.org/googlespain.html
An excellent list of papers/articles, several of which raise similar
questions as mine about the temporary nature of "relevance"...
Do any provide an answer? I am not taking a position either
way, just seeking to understand of how the court felt that
relevance changing in the future should be handled...
Thanks!
/John
Disclaimer: my views alone.
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
For all other list information and functions, see:
http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
http://www.igcaucus.org/
Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
More information about the Governance
mailing list