[discuss] [governance] U.S. to Give Up Oversight of Web policymaking Body

[JFC Morfin]

At 18:32 16/03/2014, Steve Crocker wrote:
>By "principles" I mean qualities that need to be preserved going forward.

Steve,

There are many principles, but the two main ones to "preserve" are ... missing:

1. A clear international law definition of the kind of institution 
ICANN is. With this definition will have to come a clear definition 
of what "globalization", "status and stake holders", 
"multi-stakeholderism", "IANA functions", and "Internet" mean. This 
way it would be easier to evaluate the ICANN proposed features' 
added/removed value.

2. To insure that every member of the multitude is on an equal 
footing IRT ICANN deliveries. In order to help everyone checking this 
I propose that we inititiate some indepth tracking of the deliveries, 
and of the cases, situations and risks of unequal footing among the 
multitude, and reporting of the propositions addressing them.

jfc  


-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t