[governance] Re: [bestbits] Three NETmundial submissions launched for endorsement at bestbits.net

[Garth Graham]

Accepting that MS improvement is a desirable, it's important to ask - and then what happens?  In my experience, the governments are really seeking to reduce the "burden" of government. Noticing that MS has enabled the self-regulation of the sector's rule making/decision making, they then fire all the regulators, thus simplifying the pool of stakeholders significantly. 

GG

> On Mar 8, 2014, at 2:12 PM, "michael gurstein" <gurstein at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 2. MSism in this, our context is not exclusively about consultation
> processes but rather and more frequently about public policy decision making
> processes with the notions of MSism determining who is at the table (the
> various "stakeholders") and where the designated process is one of
> "consensus" which means in fact that any of the "stakeholders" gets to veto
> and thus largely determine the outcome decision. In this latter process how
> and by whom "stakeholders" are designated (or self-designate), their
> internal processes of selection (and exclusion), the overall transparency
> and accountability of these processes of course, becomes absolutely crucial
> since the outcome of these MS processes will be determined by those having
> inputs into those processes and if those processes are flawed or corrupted
> then the outputs will be flawed or corrupted

-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t