[governance] Finding IGC voice... again, on NETMundial and beyond.

[parminder]

On the other hand, my organisations and 45 others had suggested a 
Technical Oversight Board which will consist of 2-3 persons from each 
geo- political region, these people being from key technical academic 
institutions, and a method selection/ election from among possible 
candidates from each region could be devised... Plus, one member from 
each region could come from the respective RIR...

This is a much more democratic spread then getting root operators as 
ICANN's overseers (an overwhelming number from the US, and all from 
developed countries) , or even TLD operators, who are mostly from the 
US, apart from the root operator/ TLD owners proposal suffering from the 
problem of those regulated overseeing the regulators....

parminder


On Tuesday 04 March 2014 06:06 AM, parminder at itforchange.net wrote:
>>   I do think it's worth having a bullet on the IANA issue
>> --internalization/
>> internationalization/ globalization-- as part of an IGC submission.
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 2:33 PM, Milton L Mueller <mueller at syr.edu> wrote:
>>
>>> There are two proposals on the table: Ian's, which would strengthen
>>> ICANN
>>> by simply giving it control of IANA, and the IGP proposal, which takes
>>> IANA
>>> out of ICANN and makes it an independent entity controlled by all the
>>> world's TLD registries and root server operators.
>>>
>>> At the very least, a statement from IGC could reference both proposals
>>> as
>>> something worth considering.
>>
>> This sounds to me like a good compromise under the current time
>> constraints.
> I am unable to agree to a model where those who are supposed to be
> regulated supervise the regulators.... .(next, telcos supervise FCC and
> such telecom regulators!?) I would even call it weird.
>
> parminder
>
>>
>>> Preferably, however, we should have a substantive discussion about the
>>> merits of either approach.
>>>
>> Do you mean by the March 8th deadline? Otherwise we may certainly have
>> this
>> discussion not only for a possible oral contribution during Sao Paulo
>> proceedings but also for potential input in further processes beyond Sao
>> Paulo (I'm sure the NETMundial will net be the end of all this search for
>> the future of Ig.)
>>
>> Mawaki
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ____________________________________________________________
>>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>>>       governance at lists.igcaucus.org
>>> To be removed from the list, visit:
>>>       http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
>>>
>>> For all other list information and functions, see:
>>>       http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
>>> To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
>>>       http://www.igcaucus.org/
>>>
>>> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>>>
>>>
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20140304/8b7b1f90/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t