<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<br>
<font face="Verdana">On the other hand, my organisations and 45
others </font>had suggested a Technical Oversight Board which
will consist of 2-3 persons from each geo- political region, these
people being from key technical academic institutions, and a method
selection/ election from among possible candidates from each region
could be devised... Plus, one member from each region could come
from the respective RIR...<br>
<br>
This is a much more democratic spread then getting root operators as
ICANN's overseers (an overwhelming number from the US, and all from
developed countries) , or even TLD operators, who are mostly from
the US, apart from the root operator/ TLD owners proposal suffering
from the problem of those regulated overseeing the regulators....<br>
<br>
parminder<br>
<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On Tuesday 04 March 2014 06:06 AM,
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:parminder@itforchange.net">parminder@itforchange.net</a> wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:40f73e8f88b54ee3950975abec551b73.squirrel@www.itforchange.net"
type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap=""> I do think it's worth having a bullet on the IANA issue
--internalization/
internationalization/ globalization-- as part of an IGC submission.
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 2:33 PM, Milton L Mueller <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:mueller@syr.edu"><mueller@syr.edu></a> wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">
There are two proposals on the table: Ian's, which would strengthen
ICANN
by simply giving it control of IANA, and the IGP proposal, which takes
IANA
out of ICANN and makes it an independent entity controlled by all the
world's TLD registries and root server operators.
At the very least, a statement from IGC could reference both proposals
as
something worth considering.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
This sounds to me like a good compromise under the current time
constraints.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
I am unable to agree to a model where those who are supposed to be
regulated supervise the regulators.... .(next, telcos supervise FCC and
such telecom regulators!?) I would even call it weird.
parminder
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Preferably, however, we should have a substantive discussion about the
merits of either approach.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
Do you mean by the March 8th deadline? Otherwise we may certainly have
this
discussion not only for a possible oral contribution during Sao Paulo
proceedings but also for potential input in further processes beyond Sao
Paulo (I'm sure the NETMundial will net be the end of all this search for
the future of Ig.)
Mawaki
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:governance@lists.igcaucus.org">governance@lists.igcaucus.org</a>
To be removed from the list, visit:
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing">http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing</a>
For all other list information and functions, see:
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance">http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance</a>
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.igcaucus.org/">http://www.igcaucus.org/</a>
Translate this email: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://translate.google.com/translate_t">http://translate.google.com/translate_t</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>