[governance] RE: [discuss] Some more legal tangles for ICANN

[McTim]

If (and it is a big IF) there actually IS a judgement that would
compel ICANN to change delegation, I think they could easily say 'this
is not an asset of the gov of Iran".

http://www.iana.org/domains/root/db/ir.html

On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 8:57 AM, michael gurstein <gurstein at gmail.com> wrote:
> Will ICANN (be able to) do the same?
>
> M
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: McTim [mailto:dogwallah at gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 1:35 PM
> To: governance at lists.igcaucus.org; michael gurstein
> Subject: Re: [governance] RE: [discuss] Some more legal tangles for ICANN
>
> On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 4:53 AM, michael gurstein <gurstein at gmail.com> wrote:
>> But it is still a court which has evidently made a judgment.
>
> the fees paid to ICANN from Iran are exactly zero.
>
> The IP addresses are not under ICANN jurisdiction, they are RIPE IP's, not subject to US jurisdiction..
>
> RIPE has already told them to bugger off.
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
>
> McTim
> "A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A route indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel
>



-- 
Cheers,

McTim
"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A
route indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel

-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t