[governance] RE: [discuss] Some more legal tangles for ICANN

[michael gurstein]

Will ICANN (be able to) do the same?

M

-----Original Message-----
From: McTim [mailto:dogwallah at gmail.com] 
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 1:35 PM
To: governance at lists.igcaucus.org; michael gurstein
Subject: Re: [governance] RE: [discuss] Some more legal tangles for ICANN

On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 4:53 AM, michael gurstein <gurstein at gmail.com> wrote:
> But it is still a court which has evidently made a judgment.

the fees paid to ICANN from Iran are exactly zero.

The IP addresses are not under ICANN jurisdiction, they are RIPE IP's, not subject to US jurisdiction..

RIPE has already told them to bugger off.


--
Cheers,

McTim
"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A route indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel


-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t