CS consensual statement on MSism WAS Re: [governance] Vint Verf tells us the conclusion of the complex IANA transition process

[McTim]

All,


On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 10:04 AM, Norbert Bollow <nb at bollow.ch> wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Jul 2014 07:44:26 -0700
> "michael gurstein" <gurstein at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> In other words "equal footing for foxes and hens", sounds pretty good
>> in theory, in practice not so good (for the hens... exceptionally
>> good for the foxes...
>
> Equal footing means that the hens must not use their wings to try to
> escape?
>
> SCNR (=Sorry, could not resist.)
>
> On a more serious note, how should the following be classified?
>
> During the drafting process for the Paris WSIS+10 outcome document, the
> UNESCO guy running the process essentially simply turned deaf ears to
> the proposal to include a reference to the civil society WSIS
> declaration alongside the governmental one.


We have to keep in mind that the "MS" IG processes which emanate from
Geneva are not the same sort of MSism that built and developed the
Internet for the last 3+ decades.  Those are the models we should be
using, NOT the ones that come from Geneva.




-- 
Cheers,

McTim
"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A
route indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel

-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t