[governance] Rupert Murdoch Says Businesses Should Have A Larger Say in Public Policy

[parminder]

On Friday 18 July 2014 04:11 PM, Ian Peter wrote:
> Other Murdoch companies are already involved with internet 
> governance,  with 21st Century Fox a prominent member of ICC Basis,and 
> active pursuing their interests (and perhaps disproportionately) at 
> NetMundial.

Well of course.... I still cannot get over the horror of seeing the reps 
of Disney and Cisco walk over at the Net Mundial to the outcome document 
drafting group and reading out text from their small screens (yes, I 
know they were supposed to be trying to tell what an earlier version of 
the text looked like was) - while some civil society people standing by 
who butted in some comments were immediately sshhh-ed...

And right now at an ISOC group working on IG issues, the Disney rep is 
trying to tell everyone that rather than the well established policy 
term of 'local content' it is far better to use 'relevant content'. No 
prizes for guessing why.  ... There was a time when speaking on an issue 
in this manner in a policy forum when there was such a keen conflict of 
interest involved was a clear no no. But then that was before the days 
of multistakeholderism.

Also right now the framing document for the main session on net 
neutrality (which has been successfully resisted for so long by an MS 
MAG) is thoroughly colored with track changes put in by AT and T and 
Verizons of this world....

Whom are we really fooling here .....

parminder

>
>
> Ian
>
>
> -----Original Message----- From: Paul Wilson
> Sent: Friday, July 18, 2014 8:31 PM
> To: Suresh Ramasubramanian
> Cc: governance at lists.igcaucus.org ; Pranesh Prakash ; Jefsey
> Subject: Re: [governance] Rupert Murdoch Says Businesses Should Have A 
> Larger Say in Public Policy
>
> I need to watch my spontaneous comments, especially the cheeky ones.
>
> But I was referring to the fact that, arguably, News Corp has wielded 
> a disproportional influence over many things, including election 
> results. Australia is possibly their last bastion, judging by our 
> recent results; but of course, the voters are always free to do what 
> they feel is right.  :-)
>
> Paul.
>
>
>
>
> On 18 Jul 2014, at 8:17 pm, Suresh Ramasubramanian <suresh at hserus.net> 
> wrote:
>
>> There are government reps and civil society groups that are just as 
>> 'good' ad Mr murdochs people are. They still do get a say in msm. So 
>> despite everything, it will survive.
>>
>>
>> On 18 July 2014 3:45:01 pm Jefsey <jefsey at jefsey.com> wrote:
>>
>>> At 11:32 18/07/2014, Paul Wilson wrote:
>>> >God help the multistakeholder process if News Corp gets involved.
>>>
>>> Paul,
>>>
>>> are you meaning that News Corps are not (equal) stakeholders in the
>>> Information Society? Why would they not be on an equal footing with
>>> states and other stakeholders? What is worrying is an MS process
>>> where there are undefined "indirect" stakeholders and where
>>> independent users are not on an equal footing with everyone else.
>>>
>>> He does not plead for News Corp to have a larger say than ICANN, RIR,
>>> manufacturer, edge provider, ISP, etc. and  other kind of
>>> corporations. But that the role permitted to the News Corps, and
>>> Corps in general, should be larger than what it is currently
>>> permitted in order to be in accordance to their effective weight in
>>> the human/computer/corporation society of today.
>>>
>>> I hope you do not say the same about independent users (IUsers)?
>>>
>>> Take care.
>>> jfc
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
> To be removed from the list, visit:
>     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
>
> For all other list information and functions, see:
>     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
> To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
>     http://www.igcaucus.org/
>
> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>


-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t