[governance] Re: [discuss] CI case in itself was Re: [] [] Representative Multistakeholder model validity

[Louis Pouzin (well)]

+1 with Parminder

It's like a dieticians convention excluding local doctors because they are
not active on the dieticians discussion list.
Louis
- - -

On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 12:30 PM, parminder <parminder at itforchange.net>wrote:

>
> On Sunday 19 January 2014 09:40 AM, Adam Peake wrote:
>
>> On Jan 19, 2014, at 12:57 PM, michael gurstein wrote:
>>
>>  There are several other associated lists but this is the main one.
>>>
>>>
>> Could you point to any discussions about Internet governance, I'm finding
>> it hard to even see any real debate/community input to the declaration you
>> often mention.  And any discussion about interest in the Brazil meeting and
>> process:  other than email from yourself, Parminder and other IT for Change
>> staff, and Norbert, who are all active/leaders of other civil society
>> processes?
>>
>
> Adam
>
> [snip]
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20140119/e4451d64/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t