[governance] Re: [bestbits] Fwd: Re: [discuss] cgi.br release regarding Brazil Global MSM on Internet Governance

Carlos A. Afonso ca at cafonso.ca
Sun Jan 12 11:05:29 EST 2014


The obvious meaning is simply that the two structures (CGI.br and the
/1Net platform) are helping to organize the meeting -- they do not "own"
it. The phrase could be better written, I agree.

BTW, as soon as the committees are formed and start their work, the
local organizing group (LOG) will lose its meaning and will dissolve.
But I think this is obvious too.

frt rgds

--c.a.

On 01/11/2014 03:19 AM, parminder wrote:
> 
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject:     Re: [discuss] cgi.br release regarding Brazil Global MSM on
> Internet Governance
> Date:     Sat, 11 Jan 2014 10:45:00 +0530
> From:     parminder <parminder at itforchange.net>
> To:     discuss at 1net.org
> 
> 
> 
> On Saturday 11 January 2014 09:49 AM, John Curran wrote:
>> 1net Participants -
>>
>>     There appears to be an updated announcement regarding the Brazil
>> meeting -
>>     http://www.cgi.br/brmeeting/announcement2.html
> 
> 
> from the announcement.
> 
> "The meeting is a partnership between CGI.br and /1net."
> 
> So, John, do you still hold that 1Net is yet only a discussion space and
> it is upto its steering committee to make it what it wants to.... Most
> respectfully, but can we at least now shed this fiction... But of course
> I will be told now - what can 1Net do if the Brazilians are intent on
> thrusting this momentous role on 1Net? Of course 1Net did not ask for
> this role, for there is no 1Net. But then are we allowed to make guesses
> who did, nay insisted, nay extracted it. Why dont we just play open and
> fair... Everyone has the right to put their views out forcefully, to
> make alliances with whoever they can, but this is not that...
> 
> This is completely disregarding 4 key civil society networks who said at
> Bali - and then formally through a letter - that they were not going
> through 1Net but want to be directly involved in the Brazilian meeting.
> So, civil society is told, no... your views do not count... And a non
> existent 1Net is told, well, you take over.... One is really
> disappointed. This was not what President Rousseff started with. We were
> trying to make a new start. Seek new directions on where global Internet
> should go...
> 
> parminder
>>
>> FYI,
>> /John
>>
>> Disclaimer: My views alone.
>> _______________________________________________
>> discuss mailing list
>> discuss at 1net.org
>> http://1net.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> discuss mailing list
> discuss at 1net.org
> http://1net.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> 
> 
> 
> 

-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t


More information about the Governance mailing list