[governance] RE: [bestbits] Call for Transparency Process for 1Net
parminder
parminder at itforchange.net
Mon Feb 10 02:16:09 EST 2014
On Monday 10 February 2014 12:23 PM, David Cake wrote:
>
> On 10 Feb 2014, at 6:16 am, michael gurstein <gurstein at gmail.com
> <mailto:gurstein at gmail.com>> wrote:
>> Precisely what are people afraid of in insisting that 1Net, a
>> formation that was interposed and interposed itself between “CS” and
>> the Brazil meeting, make transparent its decision making processes
>> including in the crucial areas of financial supports and expenditures
>> and decisions as to inclusions and exclusions.
>
> I am not afraid at all of 1Net increasing its transparency and
> accountability mechanisms - on the contrary, that would clearly be a
> positive outcome. But I am quite afraid that we will spend a much
> larger amount of time debating the internal functioning of 1net, which
> at this point is largely a mechanism for dealing with administrative
> issues to do with a single event, rather than focussing on the
> substantive policy outcomes of that, and future, events.
This is untrue on both counts. The fact being as below;
(1) The primary purpose of the 1Net is to strongly influence (if not
actually write) the outcomes of the Brazil meeting (something I have
been insisting since the very beginning)
(2) The serious 1Net-ers want it to be a standing multistakeholder
mechanism. So many have explicitly said so on so many lists.
I think one-sided naivete is not the best response for civil society to
take to all this, which unfortunately seems to be the dominant response.
(I say one-sided naivete becuase there is hardly any naivete when for
instance a UN kind of process is involved.)
People in post colonial societies cannot but use colonial analogies to
understand geo- political situations. The British set up an
establishment in India 'merely' to facilitate its trade to 'the east'.
They ended up ruling the country for more than a century. Apologies if
the analogy is seen as 'too strong' - it is merely to underline the need
for political foresight...
parminder
> Regards
>
> David
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20140210/5e147067/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
For all other list information and functions, see:
http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
http://www.igcaucus.org/
Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
More information about the Governance
mailing list