[governance] FINAL VERSION OF THE Netmundial DOCUMENT

[Jefsey]

At 21:36 27/04/2014, Milton L Mueller wrote:
>Here's my take on the Netmundial outcome document
>http://www.internetgovernance.org/2014/04/27/netmundial-moves-net-governance-beyond-wsis/

It seems that you now have to chose between US industry and global 
civil society interests. States have not helped independent users to 
speak-up. We now are back to reality, i.e. to RFC 6852/OpenStand: 
global communities economies decide of the technologies.

The John Lapise's comment on your site is pertinent, except that the 
game now for Edge Providers is not to learn diplomacy, but to teach 
the US law and commercial treaties (e.g. TAFTA), to allied States and 
the world. The fundamental winner seems to be Google. Civil Society 
looks being a superficial non-loser, i.e. a useful idiot. Deafening 
are  the Russian and Chinese silences.

IMHO, only one thing counted: a definitive commitment to network 
neutrality. Network US-legal-non-neutrality won. Acta est fabula. The 
network has been fragmented among multistake/share/statusholders.

jfc 


-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t