[governance] stakeholder categories (was Re: NSA sabotage of Internet security standards...)

[Avri Doria]

On 19 Sep 2013, at 09:44, McTim wrote:

> ..... I can accept either scenario and develop my
>> thinking and positions over it. However, people can not be arguing one
>> position when it suits them and the opposite when it so suits. ( I aint
>> speaking about you.) The biggest problem with multistakeholderism (MSism) is
>> that it refuses to enter into such clear basic categories
> 
> We are humans, things get messy.  We can't be sorted into piles neatly.


I  also look for a notion of subsidiarity where each stakeholder group determines its own criteria for participation and representation.  

avri


-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t