[governance] stakeholder categories (was Re: NSA sabotage of Internet security standards...)

[Daniel Pimienta]

>>Some of us who support multi-equal stakeholdersim in IG do not think
>>categories are useful.
>I am happy for IGC to develop a position on whether stakeholder 
>categories exist or they do not..... I can accept either scenario 
>and develop my thinking and positions over it.

I will follow this thread with attention to see if somebody will 
enlight me on how MSism could function fairly without a functional 
definition of the categories of stakeholders...
I have to admit I doubt it seriously but I am ready to learn.

I have also to admit that I consider that many past turmoils in this 
discussion list are more, in my opinion, the results of the fuzziness 
on stakeholder categories boundaries than personal factors.
As a mathematician I am ready to adopt fuzzy logic in stead of 
boolean as long as it is coherent and complete. ;-) 


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.


-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t