[governance] US's oversight role
Suresh Ramasubramanian
suresh at hserus.net
Fri Sep 6 06:52:26 EDT 2013
If you track a process from outside and criticize it - being sufficiently informed helps.
And not trusting the icann process makes a mockery of the stakeholders that do trust it, participate in it and hope to influence change from within .. which includes many people on this caucus.
--srs (iPad)
On 06-Sep-2013, at 15:41, Norbert Bollow <nb at bollow.ch> wrote:
> Suresh Ramasubramanian <suresh at hserus.net> wrote:
>
>> Possibly. However, trust aside, to criticize a process with specific
>> statements does demand active involvement in the process - in other
>> words, a lack of informed criticism is something I can get simply by
>> looking at the comments section of various newspapers. You don't
>> need a civil society caucus, or policy focused NGOs, to come up with
>> such criticism.
>>
>> Anything more nuanced than that - which I would ordinarily expect
>> from a policy statement - does require active participation in and
>> familiarity with the process.
>
> Is this line of argument an elaboration of the position “outsiders
> should not criticize aspects of a governance process which make it
> impossible for them to trust that process”?
>
> I would strongly assert that all governance processes must be designed
> for being trustworthy to outsiders, and that any violation of that
> principle goes very much against the fundamental values of democracy.
>
> I think that it's a fact of human nature that when things go wrong in a
> group, often only outsiders are able to see clearly what is going wrong.
>
> Greetings,
> Norbert
>
>
>> On 06-Sep-2013, at 13:04, Norbert Bollow <nb at bollow.ch> wrote:
>>
>>> Suresh Ramasubramanian <suresh at hserus.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> How much do you participate in the ICANN process parminder? I would
>>>> have thought you would need to actively participate in any process
>>>> at all, to understand it to any significant degree.
>>>
>>> A trustworthy process is one where you don't need to personally
>>> participate in order to be able to understand it well enough to be
>>> able to trust it.
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
> governance at lists.igcaucus.org
> To be removed from the list, visit:
> http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
>
> For all other list information and functions, see:
> http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
> To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
> http://www.igcaucus.org/
>
> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
For all other list information and functions, see:
http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
http://www.igcaucus.org/
Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
More information about the Governance
mailing list