[governance] Stakeholders wrangle over the Brazil Summit on Internet Governance

[William Drake]

On Oct 31, 2013, at 11:23 AM, Adam Peake <ajp at glocom.ac.jp> wrote:

> I hope the MAG will send a clear message that the secretariat must be strengthen (again, I don't mean me.)

Pity, I was going to tell the MAG I think you need to be strengthened :-)

Small problem: whenever anyone tries to raise larger governance of the IGF issues that imply MAG should be doing anything more than programming a meeting, there are objections.  WGIGF notwithstanding.  But sure we can try.

BD
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20131031/7cd0fe29/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t