[governance] Draft Civil Society Brief [Background/Overview and Proposal]

[Louis Pouzin (well)]

Hi,

As long as an individual veto can block any output from IGC there is no way
to produce meaningful declarations on a sensitive issue. At the moment the
totalitarian strategy of the US gov makes all internet issues bipolar,
either siding with the US gov or not, while hiding behind rhetorical fig
leaves.

Another charter is needed, with perhaps 2/3 majority or more, but not
unanimity. Can this be achieved through the present charter, or should IGC
be formally dissolved and recreated ?

Louis
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20131026/797c7ae8/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t