[governance] Re: [bestbits] Google's growing web of influence

[Mawaki Chango]

Completely agree with Wolfgang here, and this is in line with what I said
some time ago about CS needing to develop its frameworks or positions on a
number of fundamental issues, as opposed to being just reactive mostly. So
far our positive existence has mainly been in the fact of having a charter
(IGC) and yes, submitting statements or slates of nominees when the
opportunity arises (the latter being ambiguously both a positive to some
extent and a negative/reactive forms of existence.) Now maybe the time for
maturity has come for us "To strengthen our own profile, to clear what our
interests and positions are." CS is not just an anti-government thing; it
is CS. And it is so vis-a-vis all other stakeholders. So, yes to the idea
of developing some principles, guidelines or procedures for collaboration
with any other stakeholder, particularly but not only business (as we at
least already have a long tradition in dealing with governments in the
open.)

mawaki

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Mawaki Chango, PhD
DIGILEXIS Consulting, Founder and CEO
ICT Policy & Regulations | KM & Organizational Processes | ICT4D | Digital
Records & Identity
www.digilexis.com
m.chango at digilexis.com
@digilexis
@mawakiDIGILEXIS
+225 4448 7764



On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 3:01 AM, "Kleinwächter, Wolfgang" <
wolfgang.kleinwaechter at medienkomm.uni-halle.de> wrote:

> What is needed here - and we discussed already in WSIS I and WSIS II
> nrearl ten years agi - are something like procedures for the relationship
> beteen stakeholders within a MS mechanism. From a CS point of view we
> should develop some guideliens and criteria under which we would
> collaborate with governments, private sector and the technical community.
> With all stakehholder grups CS has sometimes something in common but has
> also conflicts. This does not exclude collabboration - where it meets the
> standards, values and interests of CS - but it needs also clear positions
> where such a collaboration is a controversy. To strengthen our own profile,
> to clear what our inteerests and positions are enables us best to define
> where we can cooperate and where not.
>
> wolfgang
>
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: governance-request at lists.igcaucus.org im Auftrag von parminder
> Gesendet: So 20.10.2013 02:49
> An: bestbits at lists.igcaucus.org; governance at lists.igcaucus.org
> Betreff: [governance] Re: [bestbits] Google's growing web of influence
>
>
>
> On Sunday 20 October 2013 05:40 AM, Norbert Bollow wrote:
> > Dear all
> >
> > Google is definitely working with determination and a long-term
> > strategy to shape the public discourse as much as possible in its
> > favor, and its civil society funding activities are part of this
> > strategy
> >
> >
> http://www.spiegel.de/international/business/how-google-lobbies-german-government-over-internet-regulation-a-857654.html
> >
> > http://www.outlookindia.com/article.aspx?288214
> >
> > We need to discuss what this means from the perspective of protecting
> > ourselves from getting unknowingly corrupted and compromised. This
> > discussions needs to happen both in regard to international civil
> > society in IG as a whole and in regard to BestBits in particular.
>
> very interesting... These are very significant structural issues of
> global IG that we cannot avoid confronting directly. How much civil
> society will really be taken seriously depends on how much moral
> legitimacy we have, which is one of the chief legitimacies of civil
> society. And such legitimacy would come from confronting such issues
> directly, and being rather upfront about it. I think there should be a
> basic transparency (and accountabiltiy) code of conduct for civil
> society in IG space,  at least that part of civil society that works
> together in spaces like BestBits and IGC. May be today's BestBits
> meeting can discuss this in the session on internal BB issues etc. I
> would greatly prefer if we do so.
>
>
> Around the same time last year a similar analysis came out of how google
> was trying to (rather effectively) capture the IG related civil society
> discursive and advocacy space in Germany ...
>
>
> http://www.spiegel.de/international/business/how-google-lobbies-german-government-over-internet-regulation-a-857654.html
>
>
> Your choice of the email subject line suggests that you know of this
> german news item, but just in case...
>
>
> If google can do such a thing in a rather mature institutional system of
> Germany, we can well judge what would it be like iin places with less
> mature social institutions.. I know that in countries ranging from Korea
> to many countries in Africa, also of course in Asia and Latin America,
> Google is aggressively throwing in funds for IG civil society groups.
>
>
> parminder
> >
> > Greetings,
> > Norbert
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>      governance at lists.igcaucus.org
> To be removed from the list, visit:
>      http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
>
> For all other list information and functions, see:
>      http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
> To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
>      http://www.igcaucus.org/
>
> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20131020/2f489978/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t