Oversight role (was Re: [governance] "technical community fails at multistakeholderism". really?)

[JFC Morfin]

At 23:17 09/10/2013, Ian Peter wrote:
>What I would like to see is a mechanism to discuss these specific 
>reforms, perhaps just between civil society and technical community 
>at this stage, but perhaps a little broader.

Correct. There is a very simple reason for that. It is that lawyers, 
politicians, and merchants do not technically scale to what could be 
supplied to match what should be demanded. The risk the statUS-quo 
pseudoMS Montevideo people fear is that Govts could multilateraly (an 
ITU digital infrastructure) support their lead users, i.e. digital 
society people who are technically able to intelligently use the 
internet resources without bothering about the so called "internet 
governance" :-)

Cheers.
jfc


-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t