[governance] more on Brazil-US stand off

[McTim]

On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 10:30 AM, michael gurstein <gurstein at gmail.com> wrote:
> McTim,
>
> Without attempting to pre-judge the actual meaning of the Bytes for All
> intervention that you have quoted it is quite clear from the article that
> you are quoting from that their concerns have to do with the specifics not
> of multialtatal `governance` but rather of national interventions into
> online expression

?? that is not clear at all.


 (and notably that in Pakistan where Bytes is particularly
> involved.
>
> This I believe, is the third time in recent months that you have either
> deliberately or through lack of attention provided misleading
> information/quotation in this forum.

How is quoting the most specific relevant bit of an article
"misquoting/misleading"?


 Notably in the other two instances no
> apology or errata was forthcoming from you.

If you accuse Google of "monopolistic behavior" and I simply point out
that in fact they are not a monopoly then we have a difference of
opinion, which we are both entitled to.  We are not entitled to our
own facts however.

I note that you have thrown your hat in the ring for the co-co role,
if you are elected, will you be banning me from posting because I am
not sufficiently anti-Google enough?

--
McTim
"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A
route indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel

-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t