[governance] DMP} Statement on Process and Objectives for the Global Multistakeholder Meeting on the Future of Internet Governance

[McTim]

Bertrand,

No disagreement with any of the below.

However, we should recognise the paradigm shift that has been under way for
the last year.

It is now the GAC that has near veto power over what goes in the root.
 NTIA only has the responsibility to determine if IANA followed their own
process in making changes.  the GAC actually gets to say to the Board "this
string should not go in the root".  We should be aware that this is a far
greater power than NTIA has ever had.

-- 
Cheers,

McTim
"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A route
indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20131130/6a58ac25/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t