[governance] IGC Nomcom results and final report

[Kivuva]

The Balance looks good, and a great representation from IGC.

Actually all the MAG nominees were good candidates.

Congrats

______________________
Mwendwa Kivuva, Nairobi, Kenya.
twitter.com/lordmwesh
google ID | Skype ID: lordmwesh


On 27 November 2013 10:41, Norbert Bollow <nb at bollow.ch> wrote:

> [With IGC coordinator hat on, for a last time]
>
> Many thanks to Ian and the voting NomCom members for this careful and
> highly credible work!
>
> Greetings,
> Norbert
>
>
> Am Wed, 27 Nov 2013 20:20:53 +1100
> schrieb "Ian Peter" <ian.peter at ianpeter.com>:
>
> > I am pleased to report the following results from the Nomcom formed
> > by Internet Governance Caucus to consider names for the IGF
> > Multistakeholder Advisory Group (MAG).
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > RECOMMENDED NEW MEMBERS
> >
> >
> >
> > Nnenna Nwakanma
> >
> > Bertrand de la Chappelle
> >
> > Stuart Hamilton
> >
> > Sonigitu Ekpe
> >
> > Matthew Shears
> >
> > Mawaki Chango
> >
> >
> >
> > The above recommended candidates are asked to provide information in
> > support of their nominations by filling in the form at
> > http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/2012/MAG%202014%20template%20.rtf.
> > Copies should be sent urgently to the IGC co ordinators and given the
> > tight timeframe you may also wish to send copies direct to the IGF
> > Secretariat
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > CURRENT MEMBERS ENDORSED TO CONTINUE AFTER ROTATION
> >
> >
> >
> > Anriette Esterhuysen
> > William Drake
> > Izumi Aizu
> > Fatima Cambronero
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > NOMCOM MEMBERS
> >
> >
> >
> > The members of the Nomcom, elected by the usual IGC random selection
> > process from a pool of 25 volunteers, were
> >
> > Deirdre Williams
> >
> > Kerry Brown
> >
> > Shaila Mistry
> >
> > David Cake
> >
> > Jefsey Morfin
> >
> >
> >
> > Ian Peter was non-voting Chair.
> >
> >
> >
> > PROCESS
> >
> > Given the short time frame available, IGC Co-ordinators called for
> > nominations on line prior to the Nomcom being formed. In order to
> > encourage more nominations, the Nomcom announced it would continue to
> > receive nominations until midnight UTC Thursday November 21.
> >
> > The following nominations were received within the advertised period
> > (one nomination was less than an hour late and was accepted by the
> > Nomcom)
> >
> > Nnenna Nwakanma *
> >
> > Bertrand de la Chappelle*
> >
> > Stuart Hamilton*
> >
> > Sonigitu Ekpe*
> >
> > Matthew Shears*
> >
> > Mawaki Chango*
> >
> > Mishi Choudhary
> > Asif Kabani
> > Rudi Vansnick
> > Imran Ahmed Shah
> > Fouad Bajwa
> >
> >
> >
> > The Nomcom also emailed all existing civil society members of the
> > MAG, asking whether they would like their names to be put forward for
> > endorsement by the IGC Nomcom. Responses were received from (some
> > before our emails)
> >
> >
> >
> > Anriette Esterhuysen *
> > William Drake *
> > Izumi Aizu  *
> > Fatima Cambronero *
> > Lillian Nalwoga
> >
> >
> >
> > In both categories, those with an asterisk after their name are our
> > recommendations.
> >
> >
> >
> > PROCESS
> >
> >
> >
> > The Nomcom decided on a set of Selection Criteria after discussion,
> > and advised these on the IGC list. The criteria are mentioned below.
> > The Nomcom then weighted all criteria in importance ( giving a
> > weighting between 1 and 10 to each criteria). The weightings are in
> > brackets after the criteria below.  Candidates were then scored with
> > a score between 1 and 10 against each criteria.
> >
> > No weightings applied to gender and geographic balance, as this
> > criteria was applied in arriving at a final slate after weighted
> > average scores for candidates against other criteria were compiled)
> >
> > Note: the scores against criteria were intended as a guide to
> > selection only, to bypass a lot of discussion in our very tight time
> > frames. They did serve to make clear some candidates who were clearly
> > favoured, some who were not, but did leave a group in the middle
> > whose scores were close and whose credentials for inclusion were then
> > compared further, particularly with intentions to achieve better
> > geographic and gender balance.
> >
> > 1. Regular contributor to civil society networks including the IGC (6)
> > 2. Consultative style with members of civil society networks
> > including the IGC (8) 3. Knowledge of/ previous experience with IGF,
> > including remote participation (6.5) 4. Knowledge of the UN system (5)
> > 5. Able to communicate the diverse range of issues, views and
> > perspectives held by civil society.(8.5)
> > 6.Able to devote the time, resources and effort necessary to
> > contribute constructively to MAG deliberations (9) 7. Willing and
> > able to report and update civil society networks including the IGC on
> > issues and progress (8)
> >
> > 8. Gender and geographic balance
> >
> > All Nomcom members provided scores against at least some of the
> > candidates. 4 of 5 Nomcom members provided scores for all candidates,
> > an exceptionally good result given the tight timeframes involved.
> >
> > Considering these scores, Nomcom members then decided on a final
> > slate reflecting as best possible some natural differences of
> > emphasis to come to a mutual recommendation. Several members
> > expressed some disappointment that the range and communicated
> > attributes of those nominated made achieving balance very difficult.
> > In particular, more women as candidates and more candidates from
> > regions we were not able to represent would have been very welcome.
> > This may partially be a factor of the very limited timeframe under
> > which we operated – however, it would have been even more limited had
> > the co –coordinators not taken the initiative to call for candidates
> > while the Nomcom was being formed.
> >
> > I must as non voting Chair thank the Nomcom members for their
> > dedicated work, a not inconsiderable effort to decide on criteria and
> > assess candidates in this limited timeframe. They really did good
> > work on your behalf.
> >
> >
> >
> > Ian Peter
> >
> > Non voting chair
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>      governance at lists.igcaucus.org
> To be removed from the list, visit:
>      http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
>
> For all other list information and functions, see:
>      http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
> To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
>      http://www.igcaucus.org/
>
> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20131127/7f9bec70/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t