[governance] IGC Nomcom results and final report
Thomas Lowenhaupt
toml at communisphere.com
Wed Nov 27 06:34:41 EST 2013
Deirdre Williams, Kerry Brown, Shaila Mistry, David Cake, Jefsey Morfin,
and Ian Peter as non-voting Chair are to be congratulated on their fine
work in selecting MAG candidates.
Having chaired a MAG NomCom I know the challenge selecting from such a
well qualified pool entails. Good work.
Best,
Tom Lowenhaupt
On 11/27/2013 4:20 AM, Ian Peter wrote:
>
> I am pleased to report the following results from the Nomcom formed by
> Internet Governance Caucus to consider names for the IGF
> Multistakeholder Advisory Group (MAG).
>
> RECOMMENDED NEW MEMBERS
>
> Nnenna Nwakanma
>
> Bertrand de la Chappelle
>
> Stuart Hamilton
>
> Sonigitu Ekpe
>
> Matthew Shears
>
> Mawaki Chango
>
> The above recommended candidates are asked to provide information in
> support of their nominations by filling in the form at
> http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/2012/MAG%202014%20template%20.rtf.
> Copies should be sent urgently to the IGC co ordinators and given the
> tight timeframe you may also wish to send copies direct to the IGF
> Secretariat
>
> CURRENT MEMBERS ENDORSED TO CONTINUE AFTER ROTATION
>
> Anriette Esterhuysen
> William Drake
> Izumi Aizu
> Fatima Cambronero
>
> NOMCOM MEMBERS
>
> The members of the Nomcom, elected by the usual IGC random selection
> process from a pool of 25 volunteers, were
>
> Deirdre Williams
>
> Kerry Brown
>
> Shaila Mistry
>
> David Cake
>
> Jefsey Morfin
>
> Ian Peter was non-voting Chair.
>
> PROCESS
>
> Given the short time frame available, IGC Co-ordinators called for
> nominations on line prior to the Nomcom being formed. In order to
> encourage more nominations, the Nomcom announced it would continue to
> receive nominations until midnight UTC Thursday November 21.
>
> The following nominations were received within the advertised period
> (one nomination was less than an hour late and was accepted by the Nomcom)
>
> Nnenna Nwakanma *
>
> Bertrand de la Chappelle*
>
> Stuart Hamilton*
>
> Sonigitu Ekpe*
>
> Matthew Shears*
>
> Mawaki Chango*
>
> Mishi Choudhary
> Asif Kabani
> Rudi Vansnick
> Imran Ahmed Shah
> Fouad Bajwa
>
> The Nomcom also emailed all existing civil society members of the MAG,
> asking whether they would like their names to be put forward for
> endorsement by the IGC Nomcom. Responses were received from (some
> before our emails)
>
> Anriette Esterhuysen *
> William Drake *
> Izumi Aizu*
> Fatima Cambronero *
> Lillian Nalwoga
>
> In both categories, those with an asterisk after their name are our
> recommendations.
>
> PROCESS
>
> The Nomcom decided on a set of Selection Criteria after discussion,
> and advised these on the IGC list. The criteria are mentioned below.
> The Nomcom then weighted all criteria in importance ( giving a
> weighting between 1 and 10 to each criteria). The weightings are in
> brackets after the criteria below. Candidates were then scored with a
> score between 1 and 10 against each criteria.
>
> No weightings applied to gender and geographic balance, as this
> criteria was applied in arriving at a final slate after weighted
> average scores for candidates against other criteria were compiled)
>
> Note: the scores against criteria were intended as a guide to
> selection only, to bypass a lot of discussion in our very tight time
> frames. They did serve to make clear some candidates who were clearly
> favoured, some who were not, but did leave a group in the middle whose
> scores were close and whose credentials for inclusion were then
> compared further, particularly with intentions to achieve better
> geographic and gender balance.
>
> 1. Regular contributor to civil society networks including the IGC (6)
> 2. Consultative style with members of civil society networks including
> the IGC (8)
> 3. Knowledge of/ previous experience with IGF, including remote
> participation (6.5)
> 4. Knowledge of the UN system (5)
> 5. Able to communicate the diverse range of issues, views and
> perspectives
> held by civil society.(8.5)
> 6.Able to devote the time, resources and effort necessary to
> contribute constructively to MAG deliberations (9)
> 7. Willing and able to report and update civil society networks
> including the IGC on issues and progress (8)
>
> 8. Gender and geographic balance
>
> All Nomcom members provided scores against at least some of the
> candidates. 4 of 5 Nomcom members provided scores for all candidates,
> an exceptionally good result given the tight timeframes involved.
>
> Considering these scores, Nomcom members then decided on a final slate
> reflecting as best possible some natural differences of emphasis to
> come to a mutual recommendation. Several members expressed some
> disappointment that the range and communicated attributes of those
> nominated made achieving balance very difficult. In particular, more
> women as candidates and more candidates from regions we were not able
> to represent would have been very welcome. This may partially be a
> factor of the very limited timeframe under which we operated –
> however, it would have been even more limited had the co –coordinators
> not taken the initiative to call for candidates while the Nomcom was
> being formed.
>
> I must as non voting Chair thank the Nomcom members for their
> dedicated work, a not inconsiderable effort to decide on criteria and
> assess candidates in this limited timeframe. They really did good work
> on your behalf.
>
> Ian Peter
>
> Non voting chair
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20131127/2f453447/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
For all other list information and functions, see:
http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
http://www.igcaucus.org/
Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
More information about the Governance
mailing list