[governance] High-Level Panel Organizes to Address Future of Internet Governance

[Suresh Ramasubramanian]

fully agree to what mawaki says.

--srs (iPad)

> On 18-Nov-2013, at 15:32, Mawaki Chango <kichango at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> +1 to J. Curran latest post here.
> 
> ICANN has no legitimacy to choose CS members ("representatives") to a group they have decided to form? I don't get that. ICANN includes CS members, doesn't it? What else is the ALAC crowd if not CS? And we've seen non-commercial stakeholder group members making 

[trimmed the whole email and i agree with it all]
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t