[governance] Ad hoc Best Bits strategy meeting tomorrow lunchtime

[parminder]

On Thursday 07 November 2013 01:06 AM, John Curran wrote:
> <snip>
> Parminder -
>
> For my education - where is the distinction made in the Tunis agenda?

John

The para 69 of Tunis Agenda and I quote

"69. We further recognizethe need for enhanced cooperation in the 
future, to enable governments, on an equal footing, to carry out their 
roles and responsibilities, in international public policy issues 
pertaining to the Internet, but not in the day-to-day technical and 
operational matters, that do not impact on international public policy 
issues. "

This para explicitly excludes all elements of global Internet governance 
that pertains to technical operations and do not impact international 
public policy issues. Therefore RIR, IETF, ICANN and such of the I* 
group remain 'safe' and excluded from enhanced cooperation discussions 
and any ' institutional solutions' that may emerge out of them.

regards

parminder
>
> Do we have commonly accepted terminology for referring to "Internet
> substantive public polices" vs "Internet operational matters"?
>
> Thanks!
> /John
>
> Disclaimers:  My views (and lack of knowledge) alone responsible for this email.
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20131107/854db4c1/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t