[governance] FW: [IP] The Battle for Power on the Internet Bruce Schneier
Suresh Ramasubramanian
suresh at hserus.net
Sat Nov 2 16:34:05 EDT 2013
None of this refers to power gangs of the internet though, whatever they
are supposed to mean.
--srs (htc one x)
On 2 November 2013 4:23:19 PM "Ian Peter" <ian.peter at ianpeter.com> wrote:
> well, we all read things differently and have different opinions.
>
> I thought the description of the evolution of internet usage and related
> security as a battle between individual elements, including rogue gangs
> such as Anonymous and cybercriminal groups, and slower moving but
> eventually more powerful users such as corporations and governments
> (described as feudal powers), was quite interesting. A couple of my
> favourite quotes for those who wont bother to read the article:
>
> “Medieval feudalism evolved into a more balanced relationship in which
> lords had responsibilities as well as rights. Today’s Internet feudalism is
> both ad-hoc and one-sided. Those in power have a lot of rights, but
> increasingly few responsibilities or limits. We need to rebalance this
> relationship.”
>
> “Data is the pollution problem of the information age. All computer
> processes produce it. It stays around. How we deal with it—how we reuse and
> recycle it, who has access to it, how we dispose of it, and what laws
> regulate it—is central to how the information age functions. And I believe
> that just as we look back at the early decades of the industrial age and
> wonder how society could ignore pollution in their rush to build an
> industrial world, our grandchildren will look back at us during these early
> decades of the information age and judge us on how we dealt with the
> rebalancing of power resulting from all this new data.”
>
> Ian Peter
>
> From: Suresh Ramasubramanian Sent: Sunday, November 03, 2013 7:08 AM
> To: governance at lists.igcaucus.org ; Ian Peter Subject: Re: [governance] FW:
> [IP] The Battle for Power on the Internet Bruce Schneier
>
> I did. I tend to find schneier's commentary more calculated to gain press
> quotes and retweets rather than make serious points on a nuanced situation.
>
> Security theater is a favorite phrase of his, generally used to deride
> bogus security, and it is a tactic that he uses more than often possibly on
> a fight fire with fire basis.
> English isn't my first language either, with all due respect. If M. Pouzin
> wishes, he might want to express his thoughts again in French, if you feel
> there's a communication gap here.
> --srs (htc one x)
>
>
> On 2 November 2013 3:41:09 PM "Ian Peter" wrote:
>
> I suggest read the article before commenting and complaining Suresh. You
> might find the term gangs more appropriate if you do; and even if you dont
> agree with the use of the term after reading the article, you mind make
> allowances for the nuances involved in use of words by those for whom
> English is a second language.
>
> Ian Peter
>
>
>
> From: Suresh Ramasubramanian
> Sent: Sunday, November 03, 2013 6:16 AM
> To: governance at lists.igcaucus.org ; Louis Pouzin (well)
> Subject: Re: [governance] FW: [IP] The Battle for Power on the Internet
> Bruce Schneier
>
> I must draw the attention of the co cos to this as I find this
> objectionable and insulting
>
> You are not talking about gangs here
>
> --srs (htc one x)
>
>
> On 2 November 2013 2:49:37 PM "Louis Pouzin (well)" wrote:
>
> Very well thought out. Massive relevance to present internet power gangs.
>
>
> Louis
> - - -
>
>
> On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 5:04 AM, michael gurstein <gurstein at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Worth reading the whole article. Lot's of relevance to IG.
>
>
>
> M
>
>
>
> From: David Farber [mailto:farber at gmail.com]
> Sent: Saturday, October 26, 2013 3:38 AM
> To: ip
> Subject: [IP] The Battle for Power on the Internet Bruce Schneier
>
>
>
> http://m.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2013/10/the-battle-for-power-on-the-internet/280824/
>
>
>
> The Atlantic
>
>
>
> The Battle for Power on the Internet
>
> Bruce Schneier Oct 24 2013, 7:07 AM ET
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
> governance at lists.igcaucus.org
> To be removed from the list, visit:
> http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
>
> For all other list information and functions, see:
> http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
> To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
> http://www.igcaucus.org/
>
> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20131102/98284a84/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
For all other list information and functions, see:
http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
http://www.igcaucus.org/
Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
More information about the Governance
mailing list