[governance] Potential IGC letter to US gov (was Re: NET NEUTRALITY AND MORE)

[Milton L Mueller]

> -----Original Message-----
> >
> >> Parminder <parminder at itforchange.net> wrote:
> >>> To whom, then?
> 
> Why does it have to be to "somebody"?

Exactly. ICANN needs 'oversight' in the sense that it should not be able to break laws, ignore its own rules, be corrupt, etc., but we don't need the US role supervising/second-guessing what goes into the root zone file and awarding the IANA contract. You shouldn't maintain and "give" to some other institution a pointless function. 


-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t