[governance] NET NEUTRALITY AND MORE

[Suresh Ramasubramanian]

There is a big difference between laissez faire and having a proactive and informed regulator who engages equally with industry and civil society.

In any case, there is a difference between work where you engage with the other party and try to find common ground, versus work where you characterize them as evil, greedy profiteers and oppose anything at all they say on general principles.

I fully agree with your last paragraph about a tri sector platform.

thanks
--srs (iPad)

On 28-May-2013, at 1:03, babatope at gmail.com wrote:

> I find her perspective not strange. Its sexy to think market forces will keep service providers honest but history has shown this is not always the case.
> 
> The stats on Mexico, I find interesting and wonder if anyone has similar figs for their country/region. 
> 
> As the US faces its challenges to increase ict access at cheaper rates so every citizen can engage, every nation has to decide and act on what's critical to their survival.
> 
> I'll close by saying the idea of capitalism left in the hands of private sector and govt getting out of the way of progress leaves much to be desired. I firmly believe any truly developed society must be based on a tri-sector platform ensuring adequate checks and balance for all concerned.
> Sent from my BlackBerry® smartphone from Etisalat. Enjoy high speed mobile broadband on any of our Easyblaze plans. Visit www.etisalat.com.ng for details.
> From: "michael gurstein" <gurstein at gmail.com>
> Sender: governance-request at lists.igcaucus.org
> Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 12:53:23 +0300
> To: <governance at lists.igcaucus.org>
> ReplyTo: governance at lists.igcaucus.org,"michael gurstein" <gurstein at gmail.com>
> Subject: [governance] NET NEUTRALITY AND MORE
> 
> If you were going to look for ground zero in the fight against a rapidly consolidating telecom and cable industry, you might end up on the fifth floor of the Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law in New York.
> 
> Susan Crawford, a professor at the school, has written a book, “Captive Audience: The Telecom Industry and Monopoly Power in the New Gilded Age,” that offers a calm but chilling state-of-play on the information age in the United States. She is on a permanent campaign, speaking at schools, conferences and companies — she was at Google last week — and in front of Congress, asserting that the status quo has been great for providers but an expensive mess for everyone else.
> 
> Ms. Crawford argues that the airwaves, the cable systems and even access to the Internet itself have been overtaken by monopolists who resist innovation and chronically overcharge consumers. 
> 
> 
> http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/20/business/media/telecoms-big-players-hold-back-the-future.html?nl=todaysheadlines&emc=edit_th_20130520&_r=0
> 
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
> To be removed from the list, visit:
>     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
> 
> For all other list information and functions, see:
>     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
> To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
>     http://www.igcaucus.org/
> 
> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20130528/8abbb725/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t