[governance] Industrial Progress, revisited…

[Norbert Bollow]

Andrea Glorioso <andrea at digitalpolicy.it> wrote:

> On May 19, 2013 1:18 AM, "McTim" <dogwallah at gmail.com> wrote:
> > BUTOC (Bottom Up, Transparent,
> > Open, Consensus) based processes of IG.
> 
> So is being BUTOC a necessary condition for a process to be
> multi-stakeholder? Is it also a sufficient condition?

I would in addition insist on:
* adherence to due process principles
* civility principles to prevent suppression of viewpoints e.g. through
  the various variants of mobbing
* recognition that human rights are of infinitely greater importance
  than any specific kinds of business interests (i.e. the consensus
  principle must not be used to block the implementation of human
  rights simply because some business models are incompatible)

Greetings,
Norbert

-- 
Recommendations for effective and constructive participation in IGC:
1. Respond to the content of assertions and arguments, not to the person
2. Be conservative in what you send, be liberal in what you accept

-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t