Fwd: [governance] advisors added to WG on enhanced cooperation?

[Avri Doria]

Quoted with permission.

Begin forwarded message:

> From: "Peter Major" <pmajor at bluewin.ch>
> Subject: RE: [governance] advisors added to WG on enhanced cooperation?
> Date: 10 May 2013 16:29:54 EDT
> To: "'Avri Doria'" <avri at ella.com>
> 
> Avri,
> 
> As in the previous CSTD WG on improvements to the IGF member states may come
> to the WG meeting with delegations of more than one person. In my previous
> mail I've made it clear that I want each country to be represented by one
> person, who will take the floor in our discussions. For international
> organizations I intend to have the same approach. For civil society,
> technical community and business invitations have been sent out to nominated
> persons. I have no knowledge about advisors. In the previous working group I
> had no problem with this approach and I do not think this working group is
> going to be different. I intend to discuss procedural issues at the
> beginning of our first meeting and get agreement from the members of the
> group. As I indicated I want to have transparent meetings and concentrate on
> substance. My goal is to have good discussions and achieve results according
> to our mandate. 
> I am ready to discuss this with you next week.
> 
> Best,
> 
> Peter     
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Avri Doria [mailto:avri at ella.com] 
> Sent: vendredi 10 mai 2013 19:25
> To: Peter Major
> Subject: Fwd: [governance] advisors added to WG on enhanced cooperation?
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Was wondering if you could confirm or deny.  
> 
> Thanks
> 
> avri
> 
> 
> Begin forwarded message:
> 
>> From: Adam Peake <ajp at glocom.ac.jp>
>> Subject: [governance] advisors added to WG on enhanced cooperation?
>> Date: 10 May 2013 09:40:15 EDT
>> To: governance at lists.igcaucus.org
>> Reply-To: governance at lists.igcaucus.org, Adam Peake <ajp at glocom.ac.jp>
>> 
>> Hearing rumors that "advisors" are being appointed to the CSTD working 
>> group on enhanced cooperation.
>> 
>> We go through hoops to have people appointed, rip ourselves (and
>> others) apart over the process, and then it seems there might be an 
>> unaccountable back-door.
>> 
>> I am sure well intentioned, but I think a really bad idea.  Could our 
>> members on the WG find out the truth to this rumor.  Before the group 
>> meets.  And if turns out to be correct I hope we'll ask that the 
>> practice is stopped.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> Adam
>> 
>> _

-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t