[governance] Digital restrictions management in HTML standards

[Jean-Louis FULLSACK]

 + 1 Thanks Parminder JL Fullsack




> Message du 11/05/13 05:37
> De : "parminder" 
> A : governance at lists.igcaucus.org, "Norbert Bollow" 
> Copie à : 
> Objet : Re: [governance] Digital restrictions management in HTML standards
> 
> 
> On Friday 10 May 2013 02:16 PM, Norbert Bollow wrote:
> > [with IGC coordinator hat on]
> >
> > Are there any objections to Avri's proposal below?
> 
> From Avri's proposes template " The IGC is ...*. The participants in 
> the IGC support this petition. "
> 
> Dont understand what it means.... to me it means all participants in IGC 
> support, which means IGC supports......
> 
> And if there is a typo and it is meant to say "the following or 
> undersigned participants in the IGC support the petition"
> 
> I am not sure how this in between category works, to me either (1) IGC 
> is supporting something or (2) a set of individuals/ orgs are supporting 
> something with no reference to IGC
> 
> What is bar to qualify for this new in-between category, indicated b 
> Avri's framing...... Can, for instance, I and a friend, also on the IGC 
> list, build up a statement and say,
> 
> "The IGC is ....... . The following participants in the IGC support 
> this petition".
> 
> My view: either IGC supports something and otherwise there is no mention 
> of IGC...
> 
> parminder
> 
> 
> >
> > (If we have consensus on this general course of action, I think that
> > the next steps on this would be informal editing and then a consensus
> > process to create a bit of fluff text on what is the IGC etc., to go
> > along with with the sentence that expresses support for the petition.)
> >
> > Greetings,
> > Norbert
> >
> > Avri Doria wrote on 28 Apr 2013:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I have personally signed and would support a statement if we could
> >> say something that like:
> >>
> >> "
> >> The IGC is ...*.
> >> The participants in the IGC support this petition.
> >>
> >> signed
> >> {set of those who endorse - individuals and organizational
> >> participants} "
> >>
> >> Any more and we would probably be involved in substantive issues.
> >>
> >> avri
> >>
> >> * do we have a canned "who the IGC is" stmt - or is that a
> >> substantive issue?
> >>
> >> On 28 Apr 2013, at 18:00, Norbert Bollow wrote:
> >>
> >>> What are the views about the idea of in addition issuing a brief
> >>> IGC statement in support of this petition or with a message similar
> >>> to it?
> >>>
> >>> Greetings,
> >>> Norbert
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Ian Peter wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Many people here may wish to sign this petition.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> http://www.defectivebydesign.org/no-drm-in-html5
> >>>>
> >>
> >
> 
> 
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
> governance at lists.igcaucus.org
> To be removed from the list, visit:
> http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
> 
> For all other list information and functions, see:
> http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
> To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
> http://www.igcaucus.org/
> 
> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20130511/96596694/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t