[governance] Digital restrictions management in HTML standards

[Norbert Bollow]

[with IGC coordinator hat on]

Are there any objections to Avri's proposal below?

(If we have consensus on this general course of action, I think that
the next steps on this would be informal editing and then a consensus
process to create a bit of fluff text on what is the IGC etc., to go
along with with the sentence that expresses support for the petition.)

Greetings,
Norbert

Avri Doria <avri at acm.org> wrote on 28 Apr 2013:

> Hi,
> 
> I have personally signed and would support a statement if we could
> say something that like:
> 
> "
> The IGC is ...*. 
> The participants in the IGC support this petition.
> 
> signed
> {set of those who endorse - individuals and organizational
> participants} "
> 
> Any more and we would probably be involved in substantive issues.
> 
> avri
> 
> * do we have a canned "who the IGC is" stmt - or is that a
> substantive issue?
> 
> On 28 Apr 2013, at 18:00, Norbert Bollow wrote:
> 
> > What are the views about the idea of in addition issuing a brief
> > IGC statement in support of this petition or with a message similar
> > to it?
> > 
> > Greetings,
> > Norbert
> > 
> > 
> > Ian Peter <ian.peter at ianpeter.com> wrote:
> > 
> >> Many people here may wish to sign this petition.
> >> 
> >> 
> >> http://www.defectivebydesign.org/no-drm-in-html5
> >> 
> > 
> 
> 


-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t