[governance] Spamhaus

[Suresh Ramasubramanian]

Let me ask you a question.  Did you actually face significant volumes of lost mail from those "pay to delist" blocklists?

Or was this a case of looking up your IP on say mxtoolbox.com and figuring out "oh no, I am blocked, let me get out of every single blocklist that mxtoolbox says that I'm on?"

--srs (iPad)

On 28-Mar-2013, at 18:23, "Carlos A. Afonso" <ca at cafonso.ca> wrote:

> On 03/28/2013 01:52 AM, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> [...]
>> In particular please see section 2.2.5 on conflict of interest which
>> says that while a dnsbl may be run as a commercial proposition by
>> charging a fee from sites that use it, it MUST not charge for the
>> removal of a listing, as this "steers periliously close to notions of
>> extortion, blackmail or a protection racket".
> 
> This is a RFC recommendation typically not followed. In at least two cases we were asked for money to have the IP removed from their blacklist. In one case, they would remove for free only seven days after the request, unless we were willing to pay US$100.
> 
> frt rgds
> 
> --c.a.

-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t