AW: [governance] Tallin Manual - a Cyber Warfare convention?

[Suresh Ramasubramanian]

parminder [27/03/13 10:15 +0530]:
>(1) They are rather non transparent, and non inclusive of outside 
>participation

>A UN CIRP (Committee on Internet related Policies) as a space for cross
>cutting discussions on all Internet related policy issues, in a 
>manner that is more transparent and has better multistakeholder 
>participation than perhaps any comparable body anywhere in the world 
>(including OECD, CoE, etc etc), is obviously the appropriate 

Seriously? I am afraid I dont find it "obviously appropriate" as an
institutional response. Reality suggests that it most likely is not, and
will be subsumed by other, closed processes.

And meanwhile, even India - which was initially backing this proposal that
has rather limited support among even Indian civil society or industry,
seems to have moved well away from it and is advocating engagement with
ICANN. Where does that leave the proposal, except in an IT4change position
paper or powerpoint deck?

	srs

-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t