[governance] Tallin Manual - a Cyber Warfare convention?

[Norbert Bollow]

It is in this regard also significant to note the lack of an accepted
(in the sense of getting yourself lumped into the same bucket as
"terrorists" by the US government) form of online protest in a way that
would be visible to visitors of an online entity.

Greetings,
Norbert


Carlos A. Afonso <ca at cafonso.ca> wrote:

> E.g, Camp Delta (a.k.a. Guantánamo) is going through a full-fledged 
> hunger strike for more than 45 days now -- so far 26 inmates
> officially (US count) adhered to it, but The US-based Center for
> Constitutional Rights estimates up to 130 inmates are involved in the
> protest. Inmates being force-fed and so on (*). This will be the
> culmination of a human rights tragedy which goes (so far) unpunished,
> practiced by the self-attributed greatest democracy on Earth.
> 
> People there have nothing to lose except their (now miserable) lives. 
> The US gov, on the contrary, will be heavily impacted by the 
> consequences of this. But the belief in a war-oriented policy of
> human rights (meaning human rights will always be subsidiary to any
> other national priority) has consequences, terrible consequences.
> 
> And now they promise to start killing hackers. Go figure...
> 
> --c.a.
> 
> (*) http://rt.com/news/guantanamo-bay-hunger-strike-399/
> 
> On 03/24/2013 01:37 PM, Louis Pouzin (well) wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 3:40 AM, Ian Peter <ian.peter at ianpeter.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >>    As Samuel Morse might have remarked, “What God hath wrought”.
> >>
> >> A landmark document created at the request of NATO has proposed a
> >> set of rules for how international cyberwarfare should be
> >> conducted. Written by 20 experts in conjunction with the
> >> International Committee of the Red Cross and the US Cyber Command,
> >> the*Tallinn Manual on the International Law Applicable to Cyber
> >> Warfare*<http://issuu.com/nato_ccd_coe/docs/tallinnmanual?mode=embed&layout=http%3A%2F%2Fskin.issuu.com%2Fv%2Flight%2Flayout.xml&showFlipBtn=true>
> >> analyzes the rules of conventional war and applies them to
> >> state-sponsored cyberattacks.
> >>
> >>
> >> http://www.theverge.com/2013/3/21/4130740/tallin-manual-on-the-international-law-applicable-to-cyber-warfare
> >>
> >>   - - -
> >>
> >
> > Thanks Ian for precious links. It seems that time is coming for
> > legal definitions of cyberwarfare, in which we are living already.
> > Initiatives belong to the powers that be, the only ones with the
> > capacity to follow or violate the rules. CS doesn't have much
> > influence, except through occasional media power.
> >
> > Some more frightening documents on real war:
> >
> > http://www.salon.com/2013/02/19/latin_america_territorio_libre_from_the_cia_partner/?source=newsletter&utm_source=contactology&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Salon_Daily%20Newsletter%20%28Premium%29_7_30_110
> >
> > http://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/projects/globalizing-torture
> >
> > One may observe that oppressive regimes resort to coded sanitized
> > language to mean illegal and criminal activities. This was
> > anticipated by Orwell (newspeak), and turned real with soviet labor
> > camp (concentration), nazism special treatment (gas chamber),
> > maoism reeducation (deportation), bushism and obamism extraordinary
> > rendition (torture), inter alia.
> >
> > Louis
> >
> 


-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t