[governance] Tallin Manual - a Cyber Warfare convention?

Diego Rafael Canabarro diegocanabarro at gmail.com
Sat Mar 23 14:32:55 EDT 2013 

I would like to share a paper which is be presented at the MPSA Annual
Convention. We aim at evaluating three widespread claims surrounding
cyberwarfare. And we briefly evaluate the case of Brazil. As it is a draft
paper, please, feel free to add to that as much as you deem necessary.
(paper attached) Intellectual production on the field is either
overwhelmingly carried by (or performed in replication of) reports of
governmental and intergovernmental agencies.

Maybe the greatest task for civil society is to push a qualitative
discussion of the issue of agency on cyberspace, as well as of the real
scope of different sorts of activities. Technically and politically
speaking.

Despite of my strong disagreement with great part of the Tallin Report (and
with NATO approach as a whole), it is really important to have such
discussions conducted in an open manner. Specially because some of the
tenets of cybersecurity orthodoxy endanger loads of fundamental rights.


On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 12:53 PM, Suresh Ramasubramanian
<suresh at hserus.net>wrote:

> If civil society can speak knowledgeably in this area, its inputs would be
> welcomed in a multitude of fora engaged on this issue.  I have not,
> unfortunately, seen much of that on this list at any rate.
>
> To answer Ian's comment, there is a distressing trend in more than one
> nation to use non state actors (including criminal botmasters) to carry out
> ddos attacks and break into foreign networks for espionage,  this is more
> or less similar to other nations using jehadis and mujahideen to carry out
> attacks that would be politically and strategically infeasible for their
> armed forces to carry out.
>
> So while some of the models could do with an update, it is absolutely
> essential that this practice be internationally recognized as unacceptable.
>
> --srs (iPad)
>
> On 23-Mar-2013, at 14:44, parminder <parminder at itforchange.net> wrote:
>
>
> On Saturday 23 March 2013 11:43 AM, Ian Peter wrote:
>
>  I just read through the principles outlined in this document and am
> extremely concerned at some of the implications of extending normal warfare
> “principles” to cyber infrastructure, attempts to define territoriality in
> this space, and some of the concepts that applied in guns and warships
> style conflicts being extended into cyberspace – like combatants wearing
> uniforms to distinguish themselves from civilians. And many other arguments
> based on 1940s international law that really should not apply.
>
> This, unfortunately, is a document from “credible” sources and is likely
> to have impact on NATO thinking. Therefore it is extremely concerning. I am
> interested in the reactions of people on this list who are more
> knowledgeable in this area.
>
>
> I dont claim to be more knowledgeable, but from the little I know how
> political affairs get conducted: it is best to have larger, more open
> discussions on such issues, where the less powerful countries are also
> involved. While some were always more equal then others, the trend has
> worsened in the IG space, where it is also almost normatively accepted that
> it is ok that the game be played among the biggies. Civil society normally
> plays the normative and democracy-seeking role, and expanding global
> governance spaces to include smaller countries equally, but regrettably,
> not in the IG space.
>
> Secondly, and there have been some strange comments in this regard as late
> as in the last few day - lets understand and accept that Internet
> governance is not about some rather insignificant issue of CIRs management,
> it is about so many much bigger issues, very central to the future of our
> societies. Again, civil society has a big role in defining this larger
> issue-scape rather than digging our collective head in the CIR sands,
> becuase it gives us a very good and saleable slogan of 'mutistakeholderism
> is sought to be replaced by UN inter-gov-ism'. And the most powerful
> countires want us to keep using this slogan exclusively and do nothing
> else. In all other IG areas, the strong control of Northern governments on
> how our future is evolving is so very clear that is does not admit to
> 'MSism being replaced by UNism" slogan, and thus civil society should be
> kept away from grasping and taking up these more important other IG issues.
>
>
> parminder
>
>
> Ian Peter
>
>  *From:* Ian Peter <ian.peter at ianpeter.com>
> *Sent:* Saturday, March 23, 2013 1:40 PM
> *To:* governance at lists.igcaucus.org
> *Subject:* [governance] Tallin Manual - a Cyber Warfare convention?
>
>   As Samuel Morse might have remarked, “What God hath wrought”.
>
> A landmark document created at the request of NATO has proposed a set of
> rules for how international cyberwarfare should be conducted. Written by 20
> experts in conjunction with the International Committee of the Red Cross
> and the US Cyber Command, the*Tallinn Manual on the International Law
> Applicable to Cyber Warfare*<http://issuu.com/nato_ccd_coe/docs/tallinnmanual?mode=embed&layout=http%3A%2F%2Fskin.issuu.com%2Fv%2Flight%2Flayout.xml&showFlipBtn=true>
>  analyzes the rules of conventional war and applies them to
> state-sponsored cyberattacks.
>
>
> http://www.theverge.com/2013/3/21/4130740/tallin-manual-on-the-international-law-applicable-to-cyber-warfare
>
>
>
>  ------------------------------
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>      governance at lists.igcaucus.org
> To be removed from the list, visit:
>      http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
>
> For all other list information and functions, see:
>      http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
> To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
>      http://www.igcaucus.org/
>
> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
> To be removed from the list, visit:
>     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
>
> For all other list information and functions, see:
>      http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
> To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
>     http://www.igcaucus.org/
>
> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>      governance at lists.igcaucus.org
> To be removed from the list, visit:
>      http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
>
> For all other list information and functions, see:
>      http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
> To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
>      http://www.igcaucus.org/
>
> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>
>


-- 
Diego R. Canabarro
http://lattes.cnpq.br/4980585945314597

--
diego.canabarro [at] ufrgs.br
diego [at] pubpol.umass.edu
MSN: diegocanabarro [at] gmail.com
Skype: diegocanabarro
Cell # +55-51-9244-3425 (Brasil) / +1-413-362-0133 (USA)
--
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20130323/9b6fb53d/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: CANABARRO & BORNE & CEPIK - 2013 - MPSA - Three Controversies on Cyberwar [Final Draft] [22 MAR].pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 550057 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20130323/9b6fb53d/attachment.pdf>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t

More information about the Governance mailing list