[governance] CSTD WG on Enhanced Cooperation : Update

Tue Mar 19 04:42:33 EDT 2013

Dear all

In my earlier message I said I would get confirmation from nominees for
this working group before I released the names of the candidates.

By the deadline that I gave them to express objections only one person
did so.  I am therefore in a position to release 18 of the original 19
names.

Thank you again to all these people for their willingness to serve on
the CSTD Working Group on Enhanced Cooperation and the effort they put
into the nomination process, and to the selection group for their
assistance. Thank you also to the IGC Nomcom for their work in
preselecting the IGC nominees.

The names are included in the attached document. The shortlisted
candidates that I recommended to the CSTD chair were:

(in alphabetical order with the region they are based in)

Avri Doria (N America)
Carlos Afonso (A America)
Don McClean (N America)
Grace Githaiga (Africa)
Jeremy Malcolm (Asia Pacific)
Joy Liddicoat (Asia Pacific)
Parminder Jeet Singh (Asia Pacific)
William Drake (Europe)

I was asked for 6 names (3 from developing countries and 3 from
developed countries) but I added an additional two names of people who
had scored very highly in the process and who had particular expertise
to contribute. It might also be good to have alternates in case any of
the 6 would not be able to fulfil the commitment.

Best regards

Anriette

On 13/03/2013 17:53, Anriette Esterhuysen wrote:
>
>
> Dear all
>
> *Update from the CS focal point for the convening of the CSTD WG on
> Enhanced Cooperation*
>
> *Background*
> I was asked by the chair of the CSTD (Ambassador Miguel Julian Palomino
> de la Gala from Peru) to be the focal point for selecting civil society
> participants. My task was to come up with 3 names from developing
> countries, and 3 from developed countries/ From these 6 names the final
> 5 would be selected by Ambassador de la Gala.
>
> To help me with this task, and to make it more inclusive I approached 7
> individuals that are active in internet-related civil society spaces
> and/or organisations. We were not meant to be the perfect group or a
> formal 'nomcom'. Nevertheless they are all individuals that I personally
> trust and respect and whom believe are trusted by those in civil society
> that know them and that have worked with them.
>
> I tried to make the group regionally diverse by having one person each
> from Asia, Africa, Europe, North America and South America. In
> recognition of the IGC's role in our sector, and and because both of
> them are such committed facilitators of civil society participation, I
> invited two past Internet Governance Caucus (IGC) coordinators.
>
> The composition of the selection group was as follows:
>
> Nnenna Nwakanma, FOSSFA - Africa
> Anja Kovacs, Internet Democracy - Asia
> Robin Gross, IP Justice - North America
> Fatima Cambronero,  AGEIA DENSI - Latin America
> Wolf Ludwig, Communica-CH/EuroDIG - Europe
> Ginger Paque - past-IGC coordinator
> Ian Peter - past-IGC coordinator
> Anriette Esterhuysen, APC - CSTD appointed civil society focal point and
> convenor of the group.
>
>
> I was assisted by my colleague Emilar Vushe as I was travelling for much
> of the period that we had to do our work.
>
> To avoid conflict of interest I deliberately did not invite anyone from
> APC (members or staff) to be on the selection group. I also withdrew
> from the internal APC process of selection of nominees, and, as a
> further measure to prevent conflict of interest and to create
> opportunities for others, I decided not to make myself available for
> nomination for the group. I had served on the previous CSTD Working
> Group on IGF Improvements and felt it was good to give others a chance.
>
> *Nominees*
> To make the call as wide as possible, within the extremely short
> timeframe I posted to the several lists and encouraged people to spread
> the call. In the text of my message I encouraged people from outside the
> narrow internet governance community to participate. We received 20
> nominations. One withdrew, leaving us with 19 to review. I am happy to
> disclose the names of all the nominees but I want to check with them
> first in case they have any objection to this.
>
> *'Endorsed' or pre-selected nominations*
> Some nominations were submitted by the and some by civil society
> networks or organisations. Some of the nominations were also 'endorsed'
> or supported by other individuals or organisations.
>
> To recognise the effort that has gone into these pre-selection processes
> and endorsements I pre-assigned a score of 1 to these candidates. I felt
> that any higher number would not be fair, as it was not mentioned as a
> requirement in the call for nominations.
>
> *Scoring process*
> Scoring was done using a score sheet with criteria based on my
> understanding of what will be involved in the work of the working group.
> The selection group assigned a score of 1 to 5 to each candidate against
> each of the criteria with the lowest score being 1 and the highest 5.
> The selection group was encouraged, to be as fair as possible, to score
> candidates on the basis of the information in their nomination forms.
>
>
> The criteria were as follows:
>
>
>   * Experience and expertise in public-interest oriented policy
> processes.
>
>   * Experience and expertise in EC in relation to WSIS and IG
>
>   * Ablity and commitment to put in the work and travel
>
>   * Ability to work collaboratively and confidently in multi-stakeholder
>     processes that involves both consensus building and dealing with
>     conflicting interests.
>
>
> *Shortlist*
> Based on the initial scoring I compiled a short list of 12 people. I
> then asked to selection group to review the short list, and rank them in
> order of their suitability for the WG and to give consideration to
> regional and gender balance.
>
>
> *Submission to CSTD Chair*
> After the second round of reviewing by the selection group I came up
> with a list of 8 names (the required 6 -- who were the most highly
> ranked by the selection group - with two more names from the top 12 whom
> I felt would bring particular expertise to the group) which I submitted
> to the CSTD for the Chair's final review and selection. I am not sure
> yet when the composition of the WG will be announced but I know that
> the CSTD will do this as quickly as possible.
>
> Thank you to everyone who made themselves available for nomination.
> There was huge interest in this Working Group, and the quality of the
> candidates made selection (particularly in some regions) extremely
> difficult. As I don't know the outcome of the CSTD Chair's decision, and
> as I have not communicated directly with nominees, I would rather not
> disclose the names of those that I recommended at this stage.
>
> I do want to point out to all who were nominated or nominated
> themselves that even if you do not make it onto the Working Group,
> there will still be opportunities to participate in its work through
> participating in whatever processes it establishes to get input from
> the broader internet community.
>
> My sincere thanks to the members of the selection group. Firstly, every
> person I asked said yes! I was impressed and grateful.
>
>
> Then they proceeded to work very hard, in a very short timeframe. They
> undertook the work with the seriousness it deserves. I would not have
> been able to do this without their input. In fact, this process
> confirmed my belief in the value of the 'small crowd' and in civil
> society's ability to deal with the complexity of such selection
> processes with good judgement and as much fairness as possible.
>
>
> Anriette Esterhuysen
>
>
>
>

-- 
------------------------------------------------------
anriette esterhuysen anriette at apc.org
executive director, association for progressive communications
www.apc.org
po box 29755, melville 2109
south africa
tel/fax +27 11 726 1692

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: CSTD_WG_EC_Final_Nominees.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 44884 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20130319/e87864d7/attachment.pdf>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t