[governance] Workshop Proposals - a few days to go

[Ian Peter]

yes I support as is, given we will be able to refine later on

From: Adam Peake 
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2013 7:11 PM
To: governance at lists.igcaucus.org 
Subject: [governance] Workshop Proposals - a few days to go

I support this.  

Good enough for this preliminary stage. 

There's opportunity to improve it (but according to the guidelines not change the topic significantly, but think there's scope for discussion when we have more time). And to seek support from the  two other non-govt stakeholders: have both seen it? Think they might have been cc'd on the original thread. 

If it seems ok, then the coordinators can put as the first for the 48 hour agreed text process. 

Adam




On Tuesday, March 19, 2013, Anriette Esterhuysen wrote:

  Dear all

  Here is the description of the workshop I proposed. I have included and
  built on Nnenna's suggestions.

  Anriette

  Proposed title:

  "From lessons learnt to good practice: Strengthening accountability and
  transparency in MS processes"

  Such a workshop could be jointly convened by the three non-governmental stakeholder groups in the IGF and used
  to share experiences, raise concerns, and try and identify good practice approaches. We could also discuss the composition of these constituency
  groups, including ambiguity around the definitions of the TA community and the challenges that arise at times in CS from having a mix of
  organisational members and individual CS activists and analysts.

  The outcomes of discussion at the workshop could become an input to the CSTD WG on EC.

  The objectives of the workshop could be defined as follows (building on the remarks of Nnenna Nwakanma on the IGC list):


  1. Highlight lessons learned from our involvement in multi-stakeholder
  processes

  2. Explore what has worked or not worked in terms of how stakeholder
  groups are defined and represented

  3. Build a common understanding on what would constitute sufficient
  transparency, openness and inclusion in such processes and discuss
  possible principles to work from

  4. Propose working methods for going forward

  4. Deepen the Enhanced Cooperation discussion and contribute a working
  document to the CSTD WG on EC.


  Discussion between the three groups could potentially begin in the build
  up to the IGF. There is certainly interest on the IGC list to initiate
  such discussion. We could also use the opportunity of the next IGF open
  consultation to have a face to face discussion.








--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20130319/f0e09247/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t