[governance] CSTD Working Group on Enhanced Cooperation

[Suresh Ramasubramanian]

If you think there are process issues here - raise them here. Sort them out here.

Pointing at process issues elsewhere is hypocritical to the extreme when we have our own such issues to sort out.

McTim is right.

--srs (iPad)

On 19-Mar-2013, at 9:10, parminder <parminder at itforchange.net> wrote:

> 
> On Tuesday 19 March 2013 08:54 AM, McTim wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 10:00 PM, parminder <parminder at itforchange.net> wrote:
>>> On Monday 18 March 2013 08:29 PM, Adam Peake wrote:
>>>> I doubt that will work.  There's much to do, that why there are two
>>>> coordinators.  In my experience.
>>> 
>>> Great that you are such a stickler for process and propriety. BTW, that does
>>> it make it a little odd that you are not at all enthusiastic about
>>> requesting some simple definitional clarifications from those who recently
>>> managed the very public process
>> It was hardly public,
> 
> 'public' as in related to public matters, not as in full public view..... although the two concepts should be closely connected, which is what I am arguing for.
> 
>> and ours wasn't either (until after the fact).
>> 
>> 
>> of appointing members of an important public
>>> body. What is it that saying about sauce, geese and gander......
>> I think that the phrase you are looking for is "those who live in
>> glass houses....."
> 
> Woe betide a civil society group that desists from raising questions about public processes simply becuase it has its own skeletons to hide. It is shameful to even mention it. McTim, if you have issues with the CS selection process, please mention these issues here. I for one am sure to join the discussion. Please be explicit. But dont tell us that since we have things to hide ourselves we should not ask questions from other public actors. In that case we can as well shut this IGC up. What a logic??!!
> 
> parminder
>> 
>> FWIW, I don't think we should be writing to anyone to cast aspersions
>> on other SGs.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
> To be removed from the list, visit:
>     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
> 
> For all other list information and functions, see:
>     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
> To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
>     http://www.igcaucus.org/
> 
> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t

-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t