[governance] CSTD Working Group on Enhanced Cooperation

[Adam Peake]

I doubt that will work.  There's much to do, that why there are two
coordinators.  In my experience.

Adam



On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 10:27 PM, Norbert Bollow <nb at bollow.ch> wrote:
> Adam Peake <ajp at glocom.ac.jp> wrote:
>
>> I think as coordinator it's best if you take a step back from
>> discussions.  You will find it easier to help the caucus reach
>> consensus if you are not personally involved.  At least I think most
>> of us who have been coordinators attempted that.
>
> I agree that helping the Caucus (or any group for that matter) reach
> consensus is not possible while at the same time vigorously arguing
> a viewpoint that has turned out to be controversial.
>
> It is good that the Caucus has two coordinators. So it should be
> possible for either of the coordinators to recuse him- or herself
> from exercising the coordinator role with regard to any particular
> topic on which he or she has (what turns out to be) controversial
> views, and feels strongly about them.
>
> Sala, would be possible for you to handle the consensus process(es)
> regarding the issue about representation of communities of non-technical
> academics in the CSTD Working Group on Enhanced Cooperation?
>
> This would in particular include the consensus process for the proposed
> letter to the Chair of the CSTD.
>
> Greetings,
> Norbert

-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t