[governance] Fwd: PRISM - is it about the territorial location of data or its legal ownership

Suresh Ramasubramanian suresh at hserus.net
Mon Jun 24 10:20:29 EDT 2013


Any such exemption would be explicitly granted and documented. To my
knowledge such an exemption doesn't seem to exist though. I would love to
be proved wrong.

Marie GEORGES [24/06/13 16:16 +0200]:
>OF course and there are many other long standing principles relating to
>applicable law and I showed you one case in which US accepted not to apply
>the "sovereignty" principle to data on its territory because the activity
>at stake, except "processing of related data", had nothing to do with US
>
>Other example, even if the Data Protection law is a "public order" law in
>EU, EU decided  not to apply the DP directive of 1995 to  data only "in
>transit" ....


-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t


More information about the Governance mailing list