[governance] Carta Internacional

[José Félix Arias Ynche]

  No solamente se le debe de enviar la misiva al Congreso Norteamericano,
sino también a los siguientes organismos:


-ONU

 -Comisión Europea de Justicia y Derechos Fundamentales



Para que se pronuncien ante sus Estados miembros y otros vinculados a
deliberar a un amplio, y profundo debate transparente sobre:


La interferencia con los derechos humanos de los ciudadanos de cualquier
 país, que de acuerdo con la Carta de la ONU (arts. 55 y 56) obliga a todos
sus miembros a promover “El respeto Universal a los Derechos Humanos y a
las Libertades Fundamentales de todos.


Siendo inaceptable la actual situación de la vigilancia de las
telecomunicaciones y comunicaciones digitales que los ciudadanos de
cualquier país afrontan en estos momentos, las cuales amenazan gravemente
sus derechos a la privacidad de comunicar sus pensamientos privados.


Ello no solamente viola y pone en peligro los derechos fundamentales a la
libertad de pensamiento, de opinión, de expresión y asociación que es
centro de toda práctica democrática, también viola los valores de la
dignidad humana, libertad, democracia, igualdad, Estado de Derecho y
respeto de los derechos humanos, incluidos los derechos de las personas
pertenecientes a minorías.



*Cordialmente:         José Félix Arias Ynche*
*                        Investigador Social Para El Desarrollo*






2013/6/17 Norbert Bollow <nb at bollow.ch>

> Parminder <parminder at itforchange.net> wrote:
>
> > On Saturday 15 June 2013 02:49 PM, Baudouin SCHOMBE wrote:
> > > I support this statement. After all, no one can pretend to be above
> > > the law.
> >
> > When there is no global law then it is more difficult to say no one
> > can be above the law.
>
> I think that international human rights law can reasonably be accepted
> as being a legitimate form of global law.
>
> IMO the main problem there is the weakness of the enforcement
> mechanisms.
>
> WTO rules and international copyright law have a much lower degree of
> legitimacy (especially given how much the world has changed since
> those rules were adopted, in ways that at least draw into question the
> continued validity of the assumptions on which those rule-making
> processes were based) but much stronger enforcement.
>
> Greetings,
> Norbert
>
> --
> Recommendations for effective and constructive participation in IGC:
> 1. Respond to the content of assertions and arguments, not to the person
> 2. Be conservative in what you send, be liberal in what you accept
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>      governance at lists.igcaucus.org
> To be removed from the list, visit:
>      http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
>
> For all other list information and functions, see:
>      http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
> To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
>      http://www.igcaucus.org/
>
> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20130617/37819f2d/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t